Tag Archives: huge

We Finally Have the US Release Date for Hyundai’s 2025 Ioniq 5 N Electric Supercar-Killer

The Ioniq 5 N is equipped with Pirelli P-Zero tires and large four-piston front brakes. Hyundai has not revealed the car’s range yet, but it has an 84 kWh battery and can charge from 10% to 80% in just 18 minutes.

As for the price, it’s a high-performance all-wheel drive hatchback with more horsepower than some supercars, so it’s not expected to be a budget-friendly model. While the exact pricing hasn’t been disclosed, looking at the prices of Hyundai/Kia’s performance-oriented models, like the 576 horsepower Kia EV6 GT starting at $61,600, can provide a ballpark estimate. Therefore, it’s anticipated to be priced slightly higher. Although it has not been test-driven yet, it’s evident that Hyundai has something exceptional. The 2025 Ioniq 5 N is the brand’s highest horsepower model by far, and its impressive numbers and specifications speak for themselves.

Tesla’s cost-cutting methods on electric cars is a boon for Ford

Ford’s CEO, Jim Farley, has stated that Tesla’s approach to reducing costs in electric car development and manufacturing has provided Ford with a significant advantage.

During the three months ending in September, Ford’s electric division, known as Model E, incurred a loss of $1.3 billion (£1.07bn). This was attributed to the challenging market conditions for their Ford Mustang Mach-E SUV and investments in new electric vehicle (EV) projects.

However, Ford plans to overcome these losses with its upcoming second generation of EVs, slated for release starting in 2025. This lineup will include a new electric pick-up truck and a seven-seat SUV.

In the EV industry, simply having a great product is no longer sufficient to succeed.

5 Reasons Why Safari Might Be a Better Browser Choice Than Google Chrome

Safari has a major advantage over Google Chrome as it is specifically designed for Apple hardware. It utilizes less CPU and RAM compared to Chrome because it is integrated into the Mac operating system. You can verify this yourself by opening both browsers and launching the Activity Monitor from the Utilities folder. The results will show that Safari consumes significantly fewer resources.

Resource consumption can be particularly demanding if you utilize Chrome’s extensive range of extensions and add-ons, which surpasses one hundred thousand. Although Safari offers fewer extensions, the advantage is that it consumes fewer resources. This might not be an issue for your Mac at home, but if you use a laptop on the go where battery life is crucial, you may find that Safari allows you to work longer without needing to charge.

UK’s New Car Sales in July 2022

The UK’s new car market had a strong performance in July, marking the best month for registrations since the Covid-19 pandemic began. The increase in sales was largely driven by a surge in fleet purchases.

According to the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT), the fleet market experienced a remarkable growth of 61.9% compared to July 2021. Sales to fleets made up 56% of the UK’s total car sales for the month, amounting to 143,921 units.

This figure represents a 28.3% year-on-year increase in new car sales. However, it is still lower than the 157,198 units sold in July 2019, prior to the pandemic.

There was also a significant rise in sales of battery-electric vehicles (BEVs), which increased by 87.9% compared to June 2022, reaching a total of 23,010 units. Despite this increase, the market share of BEVs in the overall sales remained consistent with the rest of the year, according to the SMMT.

A similar boost of 79.1% was seen in the sales of plug-in hybrids (PHEVs). These increases can be attributed to generous tax incentives for fleet users who choose to operate BEVs and PHEVs.

Currently, Benefit-in-Kind (BIK) tax rates for BEVs are set at 2%, while PHEVs with CO2 emissions rated at 1-50g/km are subject to tax rates ranging from 2% to 14%, depending on their electric range. In contrast, a mild-hybrid-petrol Ford Puma Ecoboost mHEV 125, with CO2 emissions of 122g/km, falls into the 22% BIK tax bracket.

Ford Puma 2021 front quarter driving

Pure-petrol engines remained the most popular choice for consumers, with 58,150 units sold, despite experiencing a 5.3% decline in market share compared to the previous year. Mild-hybrid petrol engines followed closely behind with 23,590 sales.

The SMMT welcomed the news that 3,056 public electric vehicle (EV) chargers were installed between April and June, setting a quarterly record. However, it urged the government to accelerate charger installation in order to meet the minimum target of 300,000 chargers by 2030. The SMMT stressed the need to triple the installation rate to nearly 10,000 chargers per quarter.

Mike Hawes, the chief executive of the SMMT, emphasized the importance of government support to make EVs more affordable and practical for all drivers across the country. He urged the government to take action and ensure that buying, running, and charging an EV is accessible for everyone.

The Real Difference Between Mercedes And Maybach

Mercedes-Benz has played a significant role in the innovation and development of the automotive industry. With more than a century in the business, they are the number-one brand when it comes to luxury, technology, and safety. While there are more luxurious brands out there, they are much more expensive, exclusive, and not as innovative as Mercedes-Benz. However, Mercedes-Benz decided to venture into the exclusive luxury segment with another sub-brand.

Maybach, originally an ultra-luxury brand under Daimler-Benz, was created to cater to ultra-wealthy individuals who desired a more luxurious and exclusive vehicle, while still providing the build quality of a Mercedes-Benz. The Maybach brand gained popularity among rappers and entertainers, even leading to the establishment of a record label named Maybach Music Group owned by rapper Rick Ross. However, Maybach lacked the cutting-edge technology found in its Mercedes counterparts, which hindered its success in the long run.

Maybach Was Founded In 1909 And Mercedes In 1926

Contrary to common belief, Maybach was initially an independent company and not directly associated with the Mercedes brand. It was founded by Wilhelm Maybach and his son Karl Maybach in 1909 after Wilhelm left the Daimler Motors Corporation. They began by manufacturing diesel airplane engines before producing their first car, the Maybach W1, in 1919. The company produced 12 different models before being acquired by Mercedes in 1960.

Mercedes-Benz, on the other hand, was originally founded in 1926 as Daimler-Benz by Gottlieb Daimler, who owned Daimler Motors Corporation, and Karl Benz. Mercedes has since been recognized as a pioneer in automotive technology and is one of the most well-known and longest-standing luxury automotive brands in history. To this day, the brand continues to flourish with its Performance AMG and Maybach Luxury divisions.

What’s The Difference Between Mercedes And Maybach

Mercedes-Benz serves as the main brand, offering a wide range of vehicles in its lineup. It includes everything from the affordable A-class to luxurious S-class models, as well as small crossovers and large, luxurious family SUVs. The goal is to provide cars for customers who still desire the accessible Mercedes brand, while also catering to wealthy individuals.

Maybach, on the other hand, focuses on creating bespoke ultra-luxury cars based on Mercedes vehicles, specifically designed for the wealthy. These cars are sold in limited numbers and offer extensive customization options beyond what regular Mercedes cars provide. Maybach vehicles pride themselves on attention to detail, whether it be the quality of materials used or the exquisite craftsmanship for which the brand has become known.

The Maybach models, including the Maybach 57, 62, and the one-off Exelero, were all produced in limited numbers and carried hefty price tags. Maybach’s meticulous manufacturing process and unparalleled features set it apart from regular Mercedes vehicles.

The Maybach 57 And 62 Were Based On The W140 S-Class

Under Mercedes ownership, Maybach did not release another vehicle until the Maybach concept in 1997, which was based on the W140 Mercedes S-class produced between 1991-1998. This particular S-class model was renowned for its exceptional build quality, making it an ideal platform to create an ultra-luxury vehicle. However, Maybach did not launch the finished product until 2002.

The Maybach 57 and 62 models were introduced in 2002, but they still utilized the older W140 S-class chassis. During that time, the new W220 S-class had just been released with upgraded features and technology. However, Maybach excelled in terms of technology and comfort features, surpassing even Rolls-Royce. The Maybach models were also longer than any S-class variant available at the time, catering to owners who desired chauffeured transportation.

In 2008, the Maybach brand ranked number one ahead of Rolls-Royce and Bentley in the Luxury Brand Status Index. These vehicles became highly sought after by wealthy individuals, with rappers like DJ Khaled, Rick Ross, and Birdman featuring them in their music videos. Despite Mercedes-Benz producing other noteworthy vehicles, Maybach received significantly more media attention.

Maybach Was Canceled In 2012 Due To Poor Sales

While Mercedes had a successful lineup of vehicles that consistently achieved strong sales, Maybach struggled with poor sales figures. Maybach only produced two models with various variations and one concept car:

  • Maybach 57
  • Maybach 62
  • Maybach Landaulet (one-off concept)

Despite having a wealthy clientele, Maybach proved to be a financial burden for Mercedes-Benz due to its high production costs. The vehicles carried hefty price tags, with the base Maybach 57 starting at $366,000 and the Landaulet exceeding $1.3 million. In comparison, the S-class models ranged from $70,000 to $180,000, while Rolls-Royces started at $300,000. Moreover, Rolls-Royce outsold Maybach, further impacting its sales performance.

In the decade of its production, Maybach projected annual sales of 2,000 cars, but ultimately sold just over 3,000 units. In contrast, Rolls-Royce sold 2,711 cars in 2010 alone. Furthermore, the W211 S-class sold 11,200 cars in its worst year (2009) and over 30,000 in 2006 in the United States alone. Plans were being made for a new generation of Maybach vehicles in collaboration with Aston Martin, alongside the new Aston Martin Lagonda. However, with only 44 Maybachs sold in 2011, the brand was discontinued in 2012.

Maybach Is Now An Ultra-Luxury Trim For The Mercedes S-class

In 2015, Mercedes revived the Maybach name as an ultra-luxury trim level of the S-class. The first car under this revival was the Mercedes Maybach S600, accompanied by the Vision Mercedes Maybach Concept 6 showcased in 2016, which provided a glimpse of the future Mercedes design language. Current Maybach models, such as the S-class and GLS, offer more luxury features, exclusive Maybach badges, and unique paint schemes. However, these models do not feel significantly different from a regular S-class, as many of the options can be included in the standard model.

In summary, Maybach, once an affluent brand that carved a niche for itself, has been reduced to a higher trim level with special options within the Mercedes-Benz lineup.

2003 – 2023: 20 years of the Lamborghini Gallardo

The history of the “small” Lamborghini with a huge impact

Sant’Agata Bolognese, July 20, 2023: The Gallardo, which was introduced at the 2003 Geneva Motor Show, was the first Lamborghini production car with a V10 engine. It quickly became a commercial success for Lamborghini, setting numerous sales records. As the Gallardo celebrates its twentieth anniversary, Automobili Lamborghini looks back at the history of this iconic “baby Lambo”.

In the 1970s, Ferruccio Lamborghini recognized the demand for a smaller and more affordable Lamborghini. This led to the development of the Urraco, which later evolved into the Jalpa in the 1980s.

In 1987, Lamborghini began work on the L140 project, aimed at creating a more compact Lamborghini. Several prototypes were developed over the years, exploring various technical solutions including a V8 and later a V10 engine.

In 1998, Lamborghini decided to start fresh and develop a completely new car with a 10-cylinder engine. The development of the engine was led by engineers Massimo Ceccarani and Maurizio Reggiani. The engine featured a 90-degree V10 configuration with 5 liters of displacement and delivered 500 horsepower.

The first Gallardo also featured a 6-speed manual or robotized sequential gearbox and Lamborghini’s all-wheel drive system. The chassis was made from aluminum and the design of the car was inspired by aeronautics, with a focus on aerodynamics.

Throughout its production, the Gallardo underwent several updates and special editions. In 2005, the Gallardo Spyder was introduced with a new soft-top opening system. In 2007, the Gallardo Superleggera was unveiled, featuring a weight reduction and increased power. In 2008, the LP 560-4 version was introduced, followed by the LP 560-4 Spyder. In 2009, the Gallardo LP 550-2 Valentino Balboni was released, featuring rear-wheel drive. In 2010, the Gallardo LP 570-4 Superleggera, LP 570-4 Spyder Performante, and LP 570-4 Blancpain Edition were introduced.

In 2012, updated versions of the Gallardo were presented, including the Gallardo LP 560-4 and Gallardo LP 570-4 Edizione Tecnica. In 2013, Lamborghini announced the development of a GT3 program based on the Gallardo MY13, and introduced the Gallardo LP 570-4 Squadra Corse, inspired by the Gallardo Super Trofeo race car.

On November 25, 2013, the last Lamborghini Gallardo rolled off the production line. Over the course of its production, the Gallardo achieved significant success, with a total of 14,022 units produced and sold in 45 countries.

The Lamborghini Gallardo has left an indelible mark on the world of super sports cars, solidifying its place among the icons of Italian design and automotive engineering.

24h Spa-Francorchamps: BMW M Motorsport teams confident as they travel to world’s biggest GT3 race.

Spa-Francorchamps. BMW M Motorsport is set to compete in the 24 Hours of Spa-Francorchamps (BEL) this weekend, with a strong team of drivers and teams aiming for the 25th overall win for the BMW brand in the Ardennes region. With 24 previous wins, BMW holds the record and has a good chance of continuing their success at the largest GT3 race in the world. In the Pro category, BMW M Team WRT and ROWE Racing, with two BMW M4 GT3s each, along with 12 BMW M works drivers, will be competing for the top spot on the podium on Sunday. There will be a total of seven BMW M4 GT3s on the starting grid.

 

Belgium’s BMW M Team WRT will be making their debut at their home event with the BMW M4 GT3 and will be fielding four cars. Maxime Martin, Dries Vanthoor, and Charles Weerts, along with Valentino Rossi, Sheldon van der Linde, and Augusto Farfus, will be representing Belgium in the two Pro cars. BMW M Team WRT has had a challenging season so far in the Fanatec GT World Challenge Europe Powered by AWS (GTWC) Endurance Cup races and is hoping to secure their first podium at Spa-Francorchamps. On the other hand, they had a successful Sprint Cup race at Brands Hatch with three podium finishes, including Valentino Rossi’s first in the GTWC. The 24h Spa-Francorchamps is the highlight of both the GTWC Europe and the Intercontinental GT Challenge seasons. In the previous race at Kyalami, BMW M Team WRT achieved a one-two result in the series.

ROWE Racing has a strong track record at Spa-Francorchamps and in the GTWC Europe Endurance season. The team has won at Spa-Francorchamps twice (2016 & 2020) and finished in second place twice as well (2018 & 2019). Philipp Eng, Marco Wittmann, and Nick Yelloly currently lead the driver standings of the Endurance Cup after their victory in Monza and third place in Le Castellet. The members of the BMW Junior Team and BMW M works drivers Dan Harper, Max Hesse, and Neil Verhagen are also contributing to ROWE Racing’s lead in the team standings of the Endurance Cup.

Aside from the Pro category, Team WRT is entering a BMW M4 GT3 in the Gold Cup and one in the Bronze Cup. Walkenhorst Motorsport, the winner of the 2018 Spa race, is also participating in the Bronze Cup with a BMW M4 GT3. The 24h Spa-Francorchamps will start at 16:30 CEST on Saturday, July 1st.

Note to editors:

We are offering two media roundtables in the paddock at Spa-Francorchamps:

Thursday, 15:00: Head of BMW M Motorsport, Andreas Roos, WRT team principal, Vincent Vosse, ROWE team principal, Hans-Peter Naundorf

Saturday, 13:00: Head of BMW M Motorsport, Andreas Roos

Quotes ahead of the race.

 

Andreas Roos (Head of BMW M Motorsport): “After the Nürburgring and Le Mans, the 24 Hours of Spa-Francorchamps is the third iconic endurance race in the span of a few weeks. Spa is the biggest GT3 race in the world and winning there is highly esteemed. With our top-class teams and 12 BMW M works drivers, the conditions are favorable for us. ROWE Racing and BMW M Team WRT have had many wins and podiums in the GT World Challenge Europe and Intercontinental GT Challenge races so far. The BMW M4 GT3 has proven to be competitive on every track. We want to convert this potential into victory and win the first 24-hour classic with our new GT3 flagship. I’m cheering for our pro teams and the WRT and Walkenhorst Motorsport crews in other classes. It’s a source of pride that there will be seven BMW M4 GT3s on the starting grid, thanks to the hard work of every BMW M Motorsport employee.”

 

Dries Vanthoor (#32 BMW M4 GT3, BMW M Team WRT): “We are all extremely motivated to have a good weekend at Spa with our strong driver lineup. Our warm-up test went well, and the car feels good on the track. Our first goal is to make it through the night without any incidents. Then we’ll assess our position. It would be a dream come true to win my home event in Belgium. Together with the whole team, we will give our all to try and achieve this.”

 

Maxime Martin (#46 BMW M4 GT3, BMW M Team WRT): “I’m really looking forward to racing at my home event with BMW M Motorsport once again. I’m curious about the weather, as it can be unpredictable in the Ardennes. With Augusto and Vale, I have two fantastic drivers by my side, and I want to try and win the 24h Spa-Francorchamps with them, just like I did with BMW in 2016.”

Philipp Eng (#98 BMW M4 GT3, ROWE Racing): “It would be amazing to celebrate my third win with BMW and the third ROWE Racing win in Spa. I’m really excited about the event; it’s always a highlight of the season. Our first two races in the GT World Challenge Europe were fantastic, with a first and third place finish. We are heading into the weekend as championship leaders and aim to gather as many points as possible to stay in the running for the overall win at the end of the year.”

 

Neil Verhagen (#998 BMW M4 GT3, ROWE Racing): “I’m super excited for the 24 Hours of Spa this year. It’s like a comeback, the second time with the BMW M4 GT3. We had a pretty good season last year and aim to build on that success. We’ll approach the race the same way as last year, with a clean race and minimal errors. We know we have the speed; we had it last year. It’s one of my favorite races of the year, and I can’t wait to get back on the track at Spa-Francorchamps.”

 

Overview of the BMW M4 GT3 driver line-ups:

 

Pro Cup.

 

#32 BMW M4 GT3, BMW M Team WRT

Sheldon van der Linde (RSA)

Dries Vanthoor (BEL)

Charles Weerts (BEL)

#46 BMW M4 GT3, BMW M Team WRT

Augusto Farfus (BRA)

Maxime Martin (BEL)

Valentino Rossi (ITA)

#98 BMW M4 GT3, ROWE Racing

Philipp Eng (AUT)

Marco Wittmann (GER)

Nick Yelloly (GBR)

#998 BMW M4 GT3, ROWE Racing

Dan Harper (GBR)

Max Hesse (GER)

Neil Verhagen (USA)

Gold Cup.

#30 BMW M4 GT3, Team WRT

Niklas Krütten (GER)

Jean-Baptiste Simmenauer (FRA)

Calan Williams (AUS)

Bronze Cup.

#31 BMW M4 GT3, Team WRT

Adam Carroll (GBR)

Lewis Proctor (GBR)

Tim Whale (GBR)

#35 BMW M4 GT3, Walkenhorst Motorsport

Anders Buchardt (NOR)

James Kell (GBR)

Thomas Neubauer (FRA)

Bailey Voisin (GBR)

 

The Pros And Cons Of Solid-State Batteries

Solid-state batteries are a huge leap in technology, and the auto industry is embracing it wholeheartedly. GM, Volkswagen, and many others are investing substantial amounts in SSB technologies over the next decade. SSBs are lighter, safer, charge faster, and have a longer life span than traditional lithium-ion batteries. So, why isn’t every manufacturer using them? Solid-state Batteries are still a relatively new technology. Creating and manufacturing them on a large scale has presented its own set of challenges. The cost of these batteries is much greater, and while electric vehicle price tags are some of the highest in the auto world, these batteries just aren’t really feasible at this time. The scarcity of a reliable candidate for a solid electrolyte also plays a role. If solid-state batteries are going to rule the auto industry one day, these challenges must be addressed. Let’s look at some of these pros and cons in detail.

Related: Why Solid-State Batteries Are So Important For Electric Vehicles

Solid-state Batteries Extend EV Range Substantially

factorial energy solid state battery
Stellantis
a prototype solid state battery by factorial energy.

Late last year, NASA unveiled some of the solid-state battery technology that it has been working on. NASA’s battery reportedly has twice the energy density of the lithium-ion batteries currently in a typical EV. They achieved this with their innovative Solid-state Architecture Batteries for Enhanced Rechargeability and Safety or (SABERS). SABERS is being developed in order to make a sustainable aircraft, but imagine buying a Lucid Air and not having to stop for 1,000 miles. Hell, even a Chevy Bolt with 400 miles would be a dramatic improvement. There is no doubt that solid-state batteries would all but eliminate range anxiety. In addition to having more range, you are also able to charge faster. QuantumScape, a leader in the space, has claimed that its solid-state battery technology has produced 10-80-percent charge capacity in just fifteen minutes, over 400 times consecutively. The company has recently entered a partnership with Volkswagen to develop vehicles with solid-state batteries in only the next few years. If these science nerds have their math right, that should give the ID.4, currently with a 250-mile range, a much-needed boost in both range and charging capabilities.

Related: Will Solid-State Batteries Make Tesla’s EV Batteries Redundant?

As With Everything, There Is A Cost

toyota dealership
Toyota
Exterior shot of a Toyota dealership at night

With such an immense upside, It’s hard to imagine the emergence of solid-state batteries as anything except positive, but as the great Mark Frost once said “there can be no light without darkness”. The process to make a solid-state battery is complex. Because the battery uses no liquid electrolyte to transfer energy from cathode to anode, or vice versa, there has to be a solid electrolyte to take its place. Materials for this kind of technology are scarce and very expensive. On top of that, there is no standardized material that is used in the manufacturing process, and no standardized process in which they are made. This makes them extremely hard to mass produce. Some estimates put Solid State batteries at three-four times the price of traditional lithium-ion batteries. Those costs can add when you are talking about a vehicle that already can cost as much as $200,000 for a top-of-the-line model. Are the savings worth the added mileage and faster charging? That is for consumers to decide, and presumably, they will get their chance. Many major automakers including GM, Toyota, and Mercedes have all invested heavily in solid-state battery technology, in hopes of increasing range and charging capabilities.

Related: What Nobody Is Telling You About Solid-State Batteries

Solid-state Batteries Mean Fewer Explosions

General Motors E-Crate
General Motors
close up of the General Motors E-Crate 

Lithium-ion batteries have created some pretty memorable explosions over the years. These are often espoused early and often by EV skeptics, and for good reason. We all remember the Galaxy Note 7 recall. If you don’t, open up a new tab and browse YouTube for a few minutes, it’s worth it. And, phones exploding in your pocket is just the tip of the iceberg. More recently, a fire in the Bronx required the attention of 200 firefighters after an electric scooter battery exploded in an apartment building. This is only one example of the over 200 fires from lithium batteries last year in New York alone, and that’s a small battery by electric vehicle standards. What happens if the Chevy E-Crate, with its six-foot-long, 1,000-pound battery is made or installed wrong? A recall, like the one for the Chevy Bolt, could be devastating to the company, and more importantly, to the auto enthusiast who just wanted to revive their old K-10. The possibility of solid-state batteries solving this massive problem, I think most people would agree, is worth exploring. There is a reason that most pacemakers use solid-state batteries. If these batteries can be manufactured at scale, grandpa can rest easy knowing his heart and his car aren’t going to give out unexpectedly.

Related: ​​​​​​​Why Solid-State Batteries Are A Distant Dream

New Technology Works Great In A Lab, But What About The Real World?

2023 Mercedes Ecitaro
Mercedes
A 2023 Mercedes Ecitaro on a road

Earlier in this article, I cited NASA and its SABERS battery. There has been a tremendous amount of success in a lab setting. Toyota itself currently holds over 1,600 patents relating to solid-state battery technology, again for success in the lab. But how does that translate into a roadworthy vehicle, and does it at all? The answer is a solid, maybe. Currently, most automakers plan to release solid-state battery electric vehicles toward the end of the decade or later. That leaves a lot of time for speculation and bold claims, without needing anything concrete to back them up. However, a Chinese company named Baoya plans to release one later this year. The Baoya FB77 has aims of being the first production vehicle with a solid-state battery, in the sedan market. So far, the only contender for the crown is Mercedes, which produces an electric bus in Germany, that contains a solid-state battery. The challenge to overcome is the heat. The battery used in this bus operates at around 175 degrees. That’s not going to cut it on a summer day in Florida. That may be the biggest challenge for all EVs using solid-state batteries. So far all the claims and projections have mentioned that the batteries are lighter and denser, and that distinction will allow them to take up less space. But if there is extra cooling needed, we may be trading battery space for cooling space.

Related: ​​​​​​​Will Tesla Ever Come Up With Solid-state Batteries?

How Long Will A Solid-state Battery Last?

solid state battery
Nissan
a cutaway shot of a lithium ion battery next to a solid state battery.

It’s almost common knowledge at this point that electric vehicles are expected to last longer than a traditional internal combustion vehicle. Currently, it is required by the government that EVs carry a warranty of eight years or 100,000 miles. California went a step further and made it 10 years or 150,000 miles. That doesn’t appear to have stopped any of the automakers from moving forward to an all-electric future, so the claims have some weight behind them. Taking into account that all EVs are currently lithium-ion batteries, what does that say about what we can expect from solid-state batteries? Batteries with a solid electrolyte are purported to be 2-3 times denser than lithium ions, and some tests have shown that they can last twice as long or better. As I stated previously, we are still in the lab stage of the new technology, but if these tests translate into the real world, then the future of electric vehicles is looking very bright.