Tag Archives: case

Maruti Suzuki Fronx vs Toyota Glanza (Maruti Suzuki Baleno): Comparison Review

In one case, yes and in the other, nope. Read on to know why

The Fronx is the latest subcompact crossover to come from the house of Maruti Suzuki. It’s for those looking for an SUV option which is friendly to drive in the city. And its roots are based on another extremely popular platform from the Nexa stable: the Baleno. But with the Fronx costing around Rs 3 lakh over the Baleno (on-road), is it worth the stretch? 

That’s what we are here to find out. But since Maruti couldn’t lend us the Baleno, we are pitching it against the Baleno’s rebadged sibling, the Toyota Glanza

Looks 

Maruti Fronx

One area where the Fronx definitely feels worth the extra money is in the looks department. Its mini Grand Vitara vibes gives it an upmarket look. This author’s favourite angle ought to be the rear three-quarters with its sloping roofline and connected tail lamps; they look wicked when illuminated! 

It also gets a more stylish set of 16-inch alloys that add more character to the design. And the cladding around the wheel arches gives it a more rugged vibe. The front looks like a scaled-down Grand Vitara with its split headlights and large grille. You can also make the Fronx look sporty by opting for dual-tone shades, an option you don’t get with the Glanza. 

Toyota Glanza 

Maruti Suzuki Fronx

  • Insta Blue

  • Gaming Grey 

  • Enticing Silver 

  • Sportin Red

  • Cafe White

  • Nexa Blue 

  • Arctic White Splendid Silver (Available with dual-tone)

  • Grandeur Grey 

  • Earthen Brown (Available with dual-tone)

  • Opulent Red (Available with dual-tone)

  • Bluish Black

Toyota Glanza

Toyota has played safe with the Glanza. It won’t turn heads, but its design is pleasing to the eye and will age well. And yet, Toyota has given it a good amount of bling, with the Camry-inspired chrome grille. Its 8-spoke dual-tone alloys, too,  are safe and add enough shine to the profile. And finally, the neatly styled LED tail lamps round off the overall design. 

Also Check Out: Maruti Dzire Or Hyundai Aura: A Tough Decision

Interior 

Both models have a similar dashboard layout, with the floating 9-inch touchscreen infotainment system. Controls are the same between both cars and they are placed ergonomically with all of them easy to reach and use. The main differentiating factor is the colour scheme. The Glanza’s black/beige theme gives it an airy feel, while the Fronx’ black/maroon scheme with gold and silver inserts looks premium. 

Toyota Glanza

Both models get Maruti’s 9-inch touchscreen infotainment system, which initially might be a bit confusing due to its busy interface. But once you get used to it, it’s a relatively simple system to use. The Fronx also gets an added advantage of wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, which connects your phone seamlessly. The Glanza might get this feature soon via an OTA update. 

The cabin in both cars is predominantly finished in hard plastics, whose quality is par for the course. Even its fit and finish can’t be faulted and everything feels well put together. They also get padding for touch points like the elbow rest on the door pad and the central armrest between the front seats. 

Features 

Maruti Fronx

A wireless phone charger is the only extra feature the Fronx packs over the Glanza. 

Bits such as a heads-up display, 9-inch touchscreen infotainment system, automatic climate control, steering-mounted audio controls, cruise control, keyless entry with push-button start, electronically foldable and adjustable ORVMs, and the coloured multi-info display are common between the two. 

Both models get up to six airbags, three-point seatbelts all around, electronic stability control, a crisp 360-degree camera, electronic stability control, and rear parking sensors.

But considering that the Fronx commands a significant premium over the Glanza, we feel Maruti should have given it a bit more niceties such as leatherette upholstery, ventilated front seats, and probably a sunroof. 

Space And Practicality 

Ingress and egress is slightly easier in the Fronx due to its taller floor height.

The front seats are the same between the two and as a result, offer identical comfort. You get great lateral support due to the thick side bolstering, whose cushioning is soft, and therefore can easily accommodate wider frames. Even the underthigh support is satisfactory, and you can easily do long distances without any fatigue. The healthy range of height as well as fore and aft travel for both the seats and steering wheel means finding your ideal driving position is easy. 

Things are slightly different in the rear. Rear headroom is at a premium in the Fronx due to the more reclined seat angle and the sloping roofline. I am  5’8”, and my hair was brushing the headliner. 

And due to the way you’re seated, the view out of the window gets obstructed and you need to duck down a bit to get a better view. The Glanza eliminates both these problems thanks to its slightly upright recline angle. That said, anyone above six feet will still find the headroom to be tight. 

Both models are identical in terms of rear seat comfort. Legroom is aplenty and two six-footers can sit back-to-back without any issues. The bench is wide enough to accommodate two adults and one child in between. Underthigh and lateral support is satisfactory on both models, as is the foot space. But do note that if you opt for the mild-hybrid variants in the Fronx, the battery is placed underneath the left front seat, hindering foot space.

Rear occupants in both cars are treated to amenities such as rear AC vents, a type-C and USB charger, so your devices can remain topped up all the time. 

When it comes to space and practicality, surprise surprise, both models are identical. There is a slot below the driver’s side AC vent for a wallet, while the glove box is large enough to gobble a 1-litre bottle and the owner’s manual. All four door pockets are also large enough to hold 1-litre bottles and other knick-knacks. And there are two cupholders below the AC vents to place your coffee.

As for boot space, the Glanza’s 318-litre trunk is slightly bigger than the Fronx’ 308-litre boot, on paper. But that doesn’t translate into a big difference in real life. A nice rectangular shape means they can gobble one large, medium, and small suitcase with enough room to squeeze in a soft bag. The only fly in the ointment is the tall loading lip, so lifting heavy luggage in and out – in both models – will need effort. 

Performance 

For this test, we’ll be pitching the Glanza’s 1.2-litre petrol-MT powertrain with the Fronx’ 1-litre turbo-petrol MT unit. Then again, the Fronx’ lower-end trims can be opted with the 1.2-litre petrol engine. 

 

Toyota Glanza 1.2-litre Petrol

Maruti Fronx 1-litre Turbo-petrol

Engine

1.2-litre naturally aspirated four-cylinder petrol

1-litre three-cylinder turbo-petrol

Power (PS)

90PS

100PS

Torque (Nm)

113Nm 

148Nm

Transmission Options 

5-speed MT / 5-speed AMT

5-speed MT / 6-speed AT

Let’s get to the point right away. Maruti’s 1-litre turbo-petrol engine in the Fronx is the superior one here. It’s refined and driving this three-pot turbo-petrol engine is smooth and responsive. You can potter around town in higher gears, And to make a move on, all you have to do is press on the throttle and it picks up speeds without any drama. The gearbox is slick and the clutch pedal is light to operate, making city driving effortless. 

The Fronx is a potent highway cruiser and can do three-digit speeds all day long. Power delivery is linear and you just get a slight surge once the turbo spools up. Its free-revving nature and quick build-up of speed makes it mighty fun to drive, especially over a set of twisty roads. It’s only when you’re cruising and want to execute a quick overtake, will you need to downshift, as the bottom-end grunt leaves a bit to be desired. 

The Glanza’s 1.2-litre naturally aspirated petrol engine is also responsive and free-revving in nature. Like the Fronx, its controls are light and require less effort to drive around town. It’s only out on the open road where we wished it packed a bit more poke, due to its flat and dull midrange as its torque is developed higher up in the rev range. Don’t get us wrong, the Glanza can do triple-digit speeds comfortably. But you have to push the engine harder than usual while executing a highway overtake or climbing uphill with a full load. 

Ride And Handling

The Glanza, with its softer suspension setup, has a plush ride quality. It irons out all the imperfections on the road and shields you from potholes with a cushy ride. But the Fronx’ setup is still a step better. 

All the road irregularities and imperfections are ironed out in the Fronx with a flat ride. It also attacks potholes much better than the Glanza thanks to its longer-travel suspension. As a result, it doesn’t crash through big craters, making it the pick if your commute involves really bad roads. You can traverse over bad roads in the Glanza, but you have to slow down while going over large potholes to prevent it from thudding through. 

The Fronx’ slightly stiffer suspension setup also means there is almost zilch side-to-side movement when going over really bad roads. There is a bit of body movement in the Glanza, though it isn’t the point of being uncomfortable. Both models also deal with undulations really well, settling down quickly while going over expansion joints at speeds. 

Out on the open road, both models have confidence-inspiring straight line stability and they mask speeds really well. Quick direction changes are also executed without any drama. The only pinch is that they roll while you’re attacking a set of twisties.

As for the brakes, once again, both models are nearly identical with an easy-to-modulate brake pedal and have a good bite. 

Also Read: Toyota Rumion Vs Maruti XL6 Vs Kia Carens: Price Comparison

Price And Verdict 

Toyota Glanza

Maruti Suzuki Fronx 

E MT – Rs 6.81 lakh

 
 

Sigma 1.2-litre MT – Rs 7.47 lakh

S MT – Rs 7.7 lakh

 

S AMT – Rs 8.25 lakh

 
 

Delta 1.2-litre MT – Rs 8.33 lakh

G MT – Rs 8.73 lakh

Delta+ 1.2-litre MT – Rs 8.73 lakh

 

Delta 1.2-litre AMT – Rs 8.88 lakh

G AMT – Rs 9.28 lakh

Delta+ 1.2-litre AMT – Rs 9.28 lakh

V MT – Rs 9.73 lakh 

Delta + 1-litre MT – Rs 9.73 lakh

V AMT – Rs 10 lakh 

 
 

Zeta 1-litre MT – Rs 10.56 lakh

 

Alpha 1-litre MT – Rs 11.48 lakh

 

Zeta 1-litre AT – Rs 12.06 lakh

 

Alpha 1-litre AT – Rs 12.98 lakh

So, does the Fronx justify the significant premium over the Glanza?

CASE 1: VIS-A-VIS Top-spec Trims

If you have the top-end variants in mind, yes, we would advise you to spend the extra and get the Fronx. The 1-litre turbo-petrol engine demands an additional Rs 1 lakh over the naturally aspirated petrol engine, but it is worth the money due to the extra amount of zing it offers. And the additional premium you’re paying for its premium looks on the outside, a more fun-to-drive nature and the novelty factor of an SUV. And if you factor in the automatic variants, the Fronx gets a much quicker and smoother-shifting 6-speed automatic instead of the 5-speed AMT in the Glanza which is a tad slow. 

CASE 2: Top-spec Glanza vs Mid-spec Equally Priced Fronx

In the case, where you’re considering a top-spec Glanza versus an equally priced mid-spec Fronx, we would tilt towards the hatchback. Reason being it packs more features onboard, making it more value, while still retaining the same levels of comfort and practicality the Fronx offers.

Read More on : Maruti FRONX AMT

Watch Barn Find Truck From 1916 Come Alive After Sitting For 50 Years

This video showcases the remarkable resilience of the internal combustion engine. The featured vehicle is a 1916 Federal Motors truck that has been sitting untouched for over 50 years. Although lacking a cab or body, the truck still houses its original flathead four-cylinder engine. The video captures the process of getting the engine up and running again.

The initial step involves using PB B’laster penetrating fluid to free the spark plugs and cylinders. Despite its age, the engine’s interior appears to be in good condition. The powerplant utilizes a crank start and is able to ignite with just a small amount of gasoline in the cylinders. The only modification required is the replacement of a broken spark plug wire.

With a makeshift carburetor that barely functions, the owner feeds gasoline into the engine using a bottle since there is no fuel supply. Surprisingly, this is sufficient to achieve an idle. The video also offers a helpful tip for hand-cranking a car: wrap your thumb around the lever to prevent potential injuries if the crank backfires.

Reviving this century-old truck would be an arduous task. The condition of the transmission is unknown, and the vehicle lacks a steering wheel and body. All that remains is the frame, fuel tank, engine, and some suspension parts. Nonetheless, the owner plans to restore the truck by replacing the water pump, rebuilding the carburetor, and installing the missing axle shafts necessary for drivability.

It’s awe-inspiring to consider the transformation of a vehicle like this, starting from such a minimal state. While finding a suitable body may present a challenge, it is conceivable for someone to assemble something functional for rugged use, particularly since this truck was originally intended for farm work.

The Federal Motor Truck Company, which originated in Detroit, Michigan, in 1910, built not only commercial vehicles but also military rigs. Unfortunately, the brand ceased operations in 1959.

2024 Ford F-150 Platinum Unveiled Without Camouflage

Ford is in the process of developing the refreshed F-150, and the latest spy shots reveal the high-end Platinum trim without any camouflage.

The updated F-150 Platinum showcases a new front end design. The bracket-shaped running lights are still present, flanking the stacked headlights. However, the vertical section is now a straight piece, departing from the current model’s angled section at the bottom.

Nimbus Motorcycles Is Making a Comeback as an Electric Motorcycle Manufacturer

Nimbus may sound familiar to you, but we’re not talking about the electric autocycle manufacturer. We’re referring to the motorcycle manufacturer from the 20th century. Like many other early motorcycle manufacturers, Nimbus started in a different industry before venturing into motorcycles.

While Ducati began with radio equipment, Nimbus started as Nilfisk, an electric motor and vacuum cleaner company. The name “Nimbus” was derived from the surnames of its founders, H.M. Nielsen and Peder Andersen Fisker. In 1918, Fisker developed the first Nimbus motorcycle prototype as motorcycles gained popularity. In 1934, Nimbus introduced its most popular and long-lasting model, the Type C.

The Type C, a shaft-driven motorcycle, initially produced around 18 horsepower, which later increased to 22 horsepower in subsequent versions. It had a top speed of 75 miles per hour. The Nimbus Type C became popular for military and government use, serving as contract vehicles for the Danish post office, army, and police forces. It was also a reliable choice for civilian use within Denmark, although the company did not export the motorcycle.

Now, in 2023, the past is meeting the future once again. Nimbus is nostalgically remembered by many Danish fans and collectors around the world. Collectors and enthusiasts are thrilled by the idea of obtaining a rare bike that can only be seen once a year in a remote location. This explains why Nimbus motorcycles have a dedicated group of fans beyond Denmark.

Nimbus Reborn

In 2014, Claus Støvlbæk Clausen, a Danish entrepreneur, felt it was his responsibility to revive the Nimbus name as a symbol of Danish innovation and technology. He contacted Nilfisk-Advance, the owner of the Nimbus rights, to express his interest in acquiring them. Although Nilfisk-Advance initially had plans to sell to someone else, the deal fell through, and Clausen ultimately obtained the Nimbus trademark and technology rights.

Initially, Clausen hoped to secure funding from investors to start producing new Nimbuses in 2015, but this plan did not materialize. Nonetheless, Clausen persevered in his mission. He enlisted the help of the design firm 3Part, and they collaborated to create this electric bike design. The goal was to capture the essence of the Type C while reimagining it as an electric motorcycle.

3Part founding partner and CEO Simon Skafdrup stated, “It is with great humility and respect that we have agreed to be birth attendants in the development process, which will lead to a relaunch of the Nimbus motorcycle. I compare it with standing with the potential some Italians saw years ago, with grabbing the original FIAT 500 drawings and bringing the model back into the present. Incidentally launched in a pure electric version recently. There is a strong DNA and countless design details to take as a starting point, so our role on the design team may be more to select, focus, and refine than it will be to find something new.”

The company plans to produce both an electric motorcycle and an electric bicycle, with production of the motorcycle expected to begin around 2025. There has been talk of reintroducing a sidecar, which was previously used with the Type C, but no designs have been released concerning this development. As we learn more, we will keep you updated. What are your thoughts on what you’ve seen so far?