Tag Archives: Committee

Do Different Speed Limits For Motorcycles And Cars Make Sense? EU Says No

On December 7, 2023, Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) who’re seated on the Transport and Tourism Committee permitted an inventory of revisions to European Union driving license guidelines. In the tip, the group permitted a draft place containing a number of frequent sense revisions, together with issues like a minimal two 12 months probationary interval for brand spanking new drivers and making a digital driving license accessible for drivers to make use of on their smartphones. 

This issues to motorcyclists as common street customers, in fact. Also, many riders drive automobiles once they’re not driving. However, it is also important as a result of the MEPs concurrently rejected some beforehand proposed adjustments that will have positioned different speed limits on motorcyclists relying on what kind of license they maintain (A1, A2, or A).

We’re Not Kidding, Someone Proposed Adopting Different Speed Limits For Motorcyclists Riding In Europe

Kawasaki Introduces New Colorways To Z125 And Ninja 125 In Europe

The motorcycle-specific speed limit proposals that have been rejected have been these. Regardless of any common posted pace restrict on a given motorway or street, riders would face the next:

  • Riders with A1 licenses couldn’t exceed a pace of 90 kilometers per hour (or 55 miles per hour)
  • Riders with A2 licenses couldn’t exceed a pace of 100 km/h (or 62 mph)
  • Riders with A licenses couldn’t exceed a pace of 110 kim/h (or 68 mph)

For these unfamiliar with Europe’s tiered bike licensing scheme, here is the way it works:

  • A1 license holders have to be no less than 16 years of age. Qualifying A1 bikes should not have a displacement bigger than 125cc or have bikes that produce energy better than 11 kilowatts (or roughly 14.7 horsepower)
  • A2 machines should not make greater than 35 kW (or 46.9 horsepower)
  • A-level motorbikes could be any bikes, fully unrestricted, however the rider should have an A license to trip them.

Why Propose Different Speed Limits For Different Tiers Of Motorcycle Licenses?

The purpose acknowledged by Rapporteur Karima Delli, who initiated the proposal, was street security and a need to reduce and hopefully to get rid of street deaths within the EU by 2050. The aim is admirable, nevertheless it’s not clear how a pace differential between among the most among the most susceptible car operators on the street and the automobiles and vehicles round them would obtain that aim.

Evidently, sufficient MEPs discovered fault with this proposal that they rejected it. Considering that the present common car pace restrict present in EU member states is 120 to 130 km/h (or about 74.5 to 80 mph), the failings on this proposal are plain to see. 

Why This Proposal Was A Terrible And Unsafe Idea For Riders

2022 Triumph Tiger Sport 660 - Korosi Red - Traffic Light

Even for those who’ve by no means ridden in your life, chances are high good that you have in all probability pushed in a state of affairs the place different visitors goes at what appears to be a lot decrease than the posted pace restrict.

In actuality, it might solely be 10 or 15 miles per hour below. But for those who’re caught behind that driver, it is simply irritating.

As different visitors on the street that desires to get across the slow-moving car, more often than not, you could not probably care much less why they are going so slowly. You care far more that they are in your approach. You get annoyed and upset, and also you cross them as quickly as you probably can. Maybe you flip them off, otherwise you yell out your window at them.

Do we have to have a speak about street rage right here? Because that is additionally one of many many ways in which you get street rage. It’s removed from the one approach, however egregiously sluggish driving typically tends to make the blood stress rise in anybody caught behind that car.

Now, let me ask you a query. Regarding automobiles, did you image two automobiles within the state of affairs I simply proposed? If you probably did, now strive picturing a motorcycle because the slow-moving car, and a automotive or truck because the one caught behind it, eager to get previous this tremendous sluggish factor blocking its approach.

Instantly, the facility dynamic shifts. Cars and vehicles are a lot bigger automobiles than bikes. If they cross or push a motorcycle too aggressively, more often than not, it is the rider who’s going to get injured (or no less than have their car undergo harm.) The driver, in the meantime, might need a number of scratches and dents of their automotive, however will probably not need to go to the hospital. There is a significant imbalance in threat ranges right here.

Unless in addition they trip, most drivers of automobiles and vehicles merely do not care sufficient about bikes to note that “oh, that’s an A1 bike, so they can only legally go THIS fast.” Instead, they will simply see a sluggish motorcycle, and so they’ll get irritated and wish to get round it. 

If you are interested by selling street security, why would you deliberately provoke extra aggressive street conduct, particularly when all that aggro could be directed on the folks you say you wish to shield?

We do not know for sure why the MEPs rejected this proposal, however on behalf of anybody driving in Europe, we’re glad that they did.

“This is a significant victory for the European motorcyclists’ foyer. Different speeds for various license holders is essentially the most ridiculous and harmful proposal I’ve heard in a very long time,” the Federation of European Motorcyclists’ Associations common secretary Wim Taal stated in a press release.

“This would not only discourage a lot of road users to switch to powered two-wheelers, it would also put motorcyclists in an unacceptable unsafe situation. A victory like this once again proves how important it is to have strong motorcyclists’ organisations throughout Europe,” he concluded.

Here Are The Updated EU Driving License Requirements That Are In The Draft Legislation

2024 Kawasaki Z 7 Hybrid Electric Vehicle - Studio - Cockpit View
  • Driving licenses might be legitimate for no less than 15 years on bikes, automobiles, and tractors. 
  • Driving licenses might be legitimate for 5 years on vehicles and buses.
  • Some exceptions to the above could also be made.
  • A prompt obligatory well being examine could also be required for issuance and/or renewal of a driving license.
  • Inexperienced drivers would have a probationary interval of two years, throughout which stricter penalties could be imposed for infractions similar to drunk driving.
  • Due to the present scarcity of expert skilled drivers of vehicles and buses, 18 12 months olds is perhaps allowed to acquire their license for vehicles and buses that would carry as much as 16 passengers, so long as they maintain a certificates {of professional} competence. Otherwise, the age restrict could be raised to 21. Another proposed change would see 17 12 months olds be capable of drive vehicles in the event that they have been additionally accompanied by an skilled driver.
  • A driver expertise take a look at replace is proposed, which would come with subjects similar to e-bikes, e-scooters, cellphone utilization, driving in snow and slippery climate situations, driver help programs, and extra.
  • Adoption of a single digital driving license for EU member states is proposed, which might be accessible on a driver’s smartphone, and could be fully equal to a bodily, handheld license that you just would possibly carry in your pockets.

What Happens Next?

The draft proposals agreed upon by the MEPs “will possibly be voted on by the full house of the European Parliament in January 2024 plenary session,” in accordance with the European Parliament’s official launch on the topic. Stay tuned.

King vows to expedite autonomous driving legislation in the UK


What should be included in the UK’s self-driving bill?

ServCity Nissan Leaf

The Transport Committee in the UK, which includes members from various political parties, has emphasized the need for legislation concerning self-driving vehicles (SDVs) before the next general election, citing the current laws as outdated and restrictive.

Chairman of the Transport Committee, Iain Stewart, stated: “Self-driving vehicles [SDVs] are a promising British accomplishment, and we hold a competitive advantage over many other countries.

“However, all the progress we have made could be compromised if the government fails to act and introduce a transport bill in the upcoming parliamentary session, prior to the next general election.

“There are several obstacles to widespread adoption of SDVs, including public confidence in their safety, security, and their potential effects on other road users. To achieve the government’s aspirations for self-driving vehicle deployment, these challenges need to be addressed.

“We advocate for a cautious and gradual approach, initially implementing SDV technologies in well-defined contexts. Otherwise, unintended consequences may arise.”

Members of Parliament have voiced concerns regarding the government’s proposed “safety ambition” for autonomous vehicles, which states that they should reach an equivalent level of safety to that of a competent and careful human driver. MPs believe this objective is “too weak and too vague.”

The committee also recommended that the government outline a strategy for the future of human driving in an era of SDVs, which could involve changes to driving tests and a plan to ensure all drivers have a thorough understanding of SDVs.

Legal liability in SDVs will become more intricate as it is shared between the vehicle owner and the software operators. The committee advises the government to give more thought to this matter.

Support for the bill’s recommendations

Tom Leggett, a vehicle technology specialist at Thatcham Research, expressed support for the recommendations, particularly highlighting data access as a key issue.

House of Lords to Examine UK’s Plan to Transition to Electric Vehicles

The House of Lords’ Environment and Climate Change Committee has initiated an inquiry to investigate how the UK government intends to achieve its goal of decarbonising cars and vans within the next 12 years.

The inquiry aims to identify the primary barriers to reducing emissions from private transportation, as well as understand the costs and potential benefits associated with the 2030 ban on the sale of new petrol and diesel vehicles in the UK.

Furthermore, the committee seeks to assess the progress made thus far towards the 2030 and 2035 milestones, in which sales of new hybrid cars will also be prohibited.

Committee chair Baroness Kate Parminter stated, “The time has come for action. We cannot achieve net-zero without individuals making changes to our lives, how we travel, and what we buy. The use of electric vehicles for passenger transport will be part of that, and the government has committed to ending the sale of new petrol and diesel cars and vans by 2030.”

The committee has invited the public to provide evidence regarding the government’s approach to the 2030 and 2035 targets, the electric vehicle market, the experience of purchasing an electric vehicle, the disposal of electric vehicles at the end of their life, infrastructure issues at both national and regional levels, and international perspectives.

The call for evidence includes several questions, such as whether the 2030 and 2035 targets are realistic and achievable, and whether they are incentivising the growth of the electric vehicle market. The complete list of questions can be found here.

These targets have gained significant attention in recent months, with prominent newspapers and business secretary Kemi Badenoch scrutinising the phase-out. Badenoch is reportedly seeking to persuade cabinet ministers to ease the incoming zero emission vehicle mandate, which will require that 22% of all new vehicle sales be electric from 2024 and increase annually thereafter, in order to protect the UK’s declining automotive industry.

The deadline for submitting evidence to the committee is Friday 15 September.

Read more: Government considers easing impact of 2030 ICE ban