Tag Archives: 21st

FIA WEC: The BMW M Hybrid V8 Art Car will bear the beginning quantity 20 on the 24 Hours of Le Mans.

Munich. The countdown for the revealing of the twentieth BMW Art Car is underway. On twenty first May, the BMW M Hybrid V8, designed by artist Julie Mehretu and set to compete on the 24 Hours of Le Mans on fifteenth/sixteenth June, will probably be introduced on the Centre Pompidou in Paris, France. The artist is already offering glimpses into her work. Additionally, it’s now confirmed that the Art Car will carry the beginning quantity 20 and will probably be pushed by Sheldon van der Linde (RSA), Robin Frijns (NED), and René Rast (GER).

 

The #20 BMW M Hybrid V8 would be the first Art Car for the reason that 2017 season, the place the BMW M6 GTLM designed by John Baldessari raced on the 24 Hours of Daytona (USA), adopted by the digital BMW M6 GT3 Art Car by Cao Fei on the FIA GT World Cup in Macau (CHN). In the previous, essentially the most well-known BMW Art Cars have participated in Le Mans: in 1975, Alexander Calder’s BMW 3.0 CSL, in 1976, Frank Stella’s BMW 3.0 CSL, in 1977, Roy Lichtenstein’s BMW 320i Turbo, in 1979, Andy Warhol’s BMW M1, in 1999, Jenny Holzer’s BMW V12 LMR, and in 2010, Jeff Koons’ BMW M3 GT2. This illustrious assortment is now enriched by Julie Mehretu’s BMW M Hybrid V8.

Fusion of picture motif and racing automotive creates artwork on wheels.

For the design of the twentieth BMW Art Car, Mehretu makes use of the color and type vocabulary of an current large-format portray from a more moderen collection of works: obscured images, dotted grids, neon-coloured spray paint and Mehretu’s iconic gestural markings give her design an summary visible type. She transfers the ensuing picture motif as a high-resolution {photograph} onto the automobile’s contours utilizing a 3D mapping approach. This creates the distinctive creative foiling with which the BMW M Hybrid V8 will compete within the Le Mans race.

For the primary time, Mehretu is working with BMW on a three-dimensional format. The interaction of the surfaces and geometry of the automobile creates a remix of components of her portray and opens up new views for the artist in her inventive course of. In accordance with the laws of the FIA, the 3D model of the art work can solely be utilized to the BMW M Hybrid V8 with a movie wrap. For this, Mehretu is working carefully with the German Race Spirit group led by Manuel Eberl and Gertraud Brenninger to design the twentieth BMW Art Car. Race Spirit was already concerned in realising the design created by Jeff Koons for the seventeenth BMW Art Car.

Quotes on the twentieth BMW Art Car.

Julie Mehretu: “It wasn’t until after going to the 24 Hours race in Daytona last year that the idea of how to approach the BMW Art Car really crystallised. I was thinking about Frank Stella’s grid and how this could also be a shout-out to former BMW Art Car artists. And I kept thinking of this painting in my studio that I had just finished and the model of the Art Car was in my studio and I thought maybe we can try to have the car move through this painting. The creative play of what you can do in this new three-dimensional space and how many imaginations and inventions are played out to build it is highly instructive. It is not just the car itself but the designers and their deliberations as well as and foremost the drivers and their desires and aspirations which make it become this place of dreams where painting, conceptual art, aerodynamics, speed and aesthetics can participate.”

Franciscus van Meel, CEO of BMW M GmbH: “The prospect of competing in a BMW Art Car at the 24 Hours of Le Mans is an additional incentive for the entire M Motorsport team to prepare the BMW M Hybrid V8 as perfectly as possible for this big stage. In the 100th year of the race’s existence and 25 years after BMW’s last victory at Le Mans, winning there with a BMW Art Car would be the greatest possible success for all of us.”

Sheldon van der Linde: “I’m a big fan of the art that the BMW Art Cars represent. I still remember seeing the last Art Car, driven by Augusto Farfus in Macau in 2017. I’m proud to now be part of an Art Car crew myself. I haven’t seen the design yet, but I’m extremely curious and confident it will look really cool. For us, it’s something special to be even more in the spotlight at the 24 Hours of Le Mans, as if that wasn’t already the case at such a big event.”

Robin Frijns: “It’s the primary time in my profession that I’m driving a automotive with a particular design. That it is going to be one of many well-known BMW Art Cars is incredible. With such a automotive, we’ll stand out from the remainder of the sphere in Le Mans and appeal to consideration from each the media and followers. I’m positive we’ll have an action-packed week in Le Mans. Our objective is to be aggressive with the BMW M Hybrid V8 Art Car and obtain a great outcome.”

René Rast: “It’s a great honour to drive a BMW Art Car and thus become part of a very special story. As drivers, we will undoubtedly be more in the media spotlight than usual. I am very much looking forward to being a part of it.”

 

Brabham’s Track-Only BT62 Supercar Is Dead

Starting an automaker within the twenty first century is an extremely difficult endeavor. It takes immense monetary help, a rock-solid marketing strategy, and many luck. Brabham Automotive, the low-production supercar producer based in 2018, is the newest automotive model to throw within the towel.

Co-founder David Brabham, youngest son of racing legend Jack Brabham, introduced final week on Instagram that he and Fusion Capital, the funding group backing the model, have ended their relationship and dissolved the corporate, marking the tip for the BT62 supercar.

 

The BT62 was Brabham Automotive’s first product, launched in 2018. It featured aerodynamics able to producing 2,646 kilos of downforce, which surpassed the automobile’s 2,143-pound weight. Power got here from a naturally aspirated 5.4-liter V8 making 700 horsepower and 492 pound-feet of torque. The firm hoped to promote 70 of them, with costs beginning on the trendy equal of $1.35 million every.

Following the observe automotive, Brabham introduced a street-legal model of the BT62 in 2020 called the BT62R. It regarded largely equivalent to the circuit-focused machine however with a quieter exhaust, air con, adaptable suspension, and a heated windshield. The automobile did not appear to be one thing you’d need to use for a cross-country jaunt however nonetheless appeared way more comfy than the circuit-only variant.

Spec Showdown: Yamaha R7 vs. Aprilia RS 660

In the twenty first century, bike producers with important histories like to resurrect their historic badges on new machines. There’s each good cause and loads of precedent for this, in fact. Sometimes it really works in how a brand new mannequin with an previous identify is perceived, and typically it is extra difficult.

Longtime followers of middleweight sportbikes have a particular regard for the Yamaha R7 badge. That is, in fact, as a result of they’re pondering again on one of the crucial fascinating bikes of the Nineties, the racing homologation special OW02. So naturally, when Yamaha introduced plans to resurrect the R7 badge on a strong however primary and reasonably priced middleweight sportbike, it resulted in quite a lot of raised eyebrows amongst fans. 

There’s a particular logic to Yamaha’s naming alternative, because it’s meant to tackle the mantle of the R6 within the present lineup. The development from R3 to R7 and R1 is evident. However, due to the OW-02, the R7 badge comes with its personal historical past and notion that is arduous to shake.

In a means, newer producers would possibly virtually have it a bit bit simpler as a result of they do not have to contemplate all of the ramifications of reusing historic mannequin names. Instead, they’ll do what Aprilia did and take a motorcycle like its widespread RSV4, successfully chop the engine in half, and name it the RS 660. Was there an RS 660 earlier than? No, and that is the great thing about it. As the primary one among its line, it has the chance to set its personal expectations.

In this Spec Showdown, we’ve got two trendy middleweight sportbike contenders. One bears the burden of historical past and lineage on its shoulders, whereas the opposite is relatively unfettered.

Which bike reigns supreme? We can inform you on paper, although it is a battle that can likely be fought at many a observe all over the world, a number of occasions over. Note: All figures right here have been supplied by the producers.

Engine, Power, and Torque

  Yamaha R7 Aprilia RS 660
Displacement 689cc 659cc
Engine Type Liquid-cooled, twin overhead cam inline parallel twin with 4 valves per cylinder Liquid-cooled, twin overhead cam transverse parallel twin with 4 valves per cylinder
Power 72.4 horsepower at 8,750 rpm 100 horsepower at 10,500 rpm
Torque 67 newton-meters (or 49 pound-feet) of torque at 6,500 rpm 49.4 pound-feet of torque at 8,500 rpm
Gearbox 6-speed gearbox with help and slipper clutch as commonplace 6-speed with Aprilia Quick Shift up and down

On paper, the Yamaha R7 has barely larger displacement than the Aprilia RS 660, but it surely’s down on energy, to the tune of barely over 27 ponies.

Both bikes produce nearly the identical torque, though the R7 hits its peak decrease within the rev vary than the RS 660. 

There’s a transparent winner right here, though the true context of those energy figures will not be identified till we get into comparative curb weights. Power is nice, but it surely’s even higher with a machine that is lighter in weight.

Round 1 Winner: Aprilia RS 660

Chassis

  Yamaha R7 Aprilia RS 660
Frame Diamond Aluminum twin beam design with detachable subframe
Front Suspension Upside-down telescopic entrance fork with full adjustability and 5.1 inches of journey Upside-down 41mm Kayaba fork with adjustable rebound and preload and roughly 4.7 inches (120mm) of journey
Rear Suspension Link-type monocross shock with preload and rebound adjustability and 5.1 inches of journey Single shock and prime out spring with preload and rebound adjustability and 5.1 inches (130mm) of journey
Wheels and Tires 17-inch aluminum alloys with Bridgestone Battlax Hypersport S22 rubber 17-inch aluminum alloys with Pirelli Diablo Rosso Corsa II tires
Brakes Twin 298mm entrance brake disc setup and a single 245mm rear disc Dual Brembo radial four-piston caliper setup in entrance with a pair of 320mm brake discs; single Brembo two-piston caliper with a single 220mm brake disc within the rear. Both entrance and rear brakes have radial pumps and braided chrome steel brake traces from the manufacturing unit.

The Aprilia RS660 has a detachable rear subframe design, which the R7 would not have. Hopefully you will not want it, however within the occasion of a crash, that may be the distinction between merely having to switch a damaged rear subframe and having to complete your bike.

Suspensions aren’t terribly dissimilar, though the RS 660 has barely much less entrance suspension journey than the R7. How you’re feeling about that can largely be a matter of non-public desire. The similar is true for the wheels and tires, as some individuals would possibly want both the Bridgestone or the Pirelli compounds provided on every of those bikes.

The greatest distinction right here is within the brakes, the place the Aprilia RS 660 setup clearly shines. 

Round 2 Winner: Aprilia RS 660

Dimensions

  Yamaha R7 Aprilia RS 660
Wheelbase 54.9 inches 53.9 inches
Rake and path 23.7 levels and three.5 inches 24.1 inches and 4.1 inches
Seat Height 32.9 inches 32.3 inches
Curb Weight 414 kilos 403 kilos
Fuel tank capability 3.4 gallons 3.96 gallons

With a barely decrease seat peak, the Aprilia RS 660 is arguably barely extra accessible to a wider vary of riders. The distinction may be very slight right here, although, and seat peak is not every part.

A robust argument in favor of the Aprilia RS 660 is its claimed curb weight and gasoline tank capability, particularly when taken collectively compared to the Yamaha R7. The RS 660 concurrently has a bigger gasoline capability and but, it additionally weighs a full 11 kilos lower than the R7 on the curb. 

The benefit right here, as in our two earlier classes, is evident.

Round 3 Winner: Aprilia RS 660

Electronics and Other Features

  Yamaha R7 Aprilia RS 660
Electronics suite N/A 6-axis inertial measurement unit with the APRC suite together with traction management, wheelie management, engine braking, engine mapping, cruise management, and 5 experience modes together with two user-customizable ones
Lighting LED LED with cornering lights and self-canceling flip indicators
Display LCD TFT

There’s no actual contest right here. The Aprilia RS 660 is packed stuffed with options that the inventory R7 merely cannot match, not to mention beat.

Round 4 Winner: Aprilia RS 660

Price

  Yamaha R7 Aprilia RS 660
MSRP (US market; if you happen to dwell exterior the US, examine together with your native Yamaha and Aprilia sellers for probably the most correct data) $9,199 $11,499

The Yamaha R7 is $2,300 inexpensive than the Aprilia RS 660. If you are merely on the lookout for the least costly possibility between the 2, then the R7 wins.

Round 5 Winner: Yamaha R7

Overall Winner: Aprilia RS 660

Overall Winner: Aprilia RS 660

You might arguably take the $2,300 that you have saved on the MSRP of the R7 and throw it proper again into modifications and upgrades on that bike. Some riders would possibly wish to do that, and a few may not. There’s no appropriate reply; there’s solely determining what you particularly wish to do together with your bike.

Do you desire a absolutely feature-packed bike on this class that you may get pleasure from on each road and observe, proper out of the field? Or would you like the expertise of taking a much less feature-packed machine and including solely the particular modifications that you really want? Where do you get your pleasure, and what’s your finances?

On paper, the Aprilia RS 660 prices a bit bit extra, however you get an entire lot of bang on your buck.

You Ride Bikes, Not Spec Sheets

As we all the time say on the finish of a Spec Showdown, in the end, the bike that wins is the bike that greatest meets your wants.

I’ll allow you to in on a bit secret. In the previous few years, one dialog that regularly comes up amongst bike journalists at press occasions is how arduous it’s to discover a really dangerous bike today. Enthusiasts in all bike classes are spoiled for alternative on this period, and it is a real delight to see.

The actual query here’s what you are on the lookout for in your potential middleweight sportbike expertise. Once you’ve got figured that out, you will have a greater thought of which bike is greatest suited to you and your wants.

Also, spec sheets cannot inform you how a motorcycle truly feels to experience. If you are really excited by two (or extra) bikes, such because the Yamaha R7 and the Aprilia RS 660, your greatest wager is to check experience each and see how they swimsuit you. Maybe the ergonomics on one are higher suited to your body than the opposite, which might make an enormous distinction in your driving expertise. 

Another factor to contemplate on this particular case is the vendor community. Aprilias normally could be nice bikes for the proper riders, however there is no arguing the truth that Yamaha has a a lot wider vendor community than Aprilia does. How a lot you prefer to wrench on a motorcycle your self (or what reliable retailers are in your space) may also influence your resolution.