Automotive manufacturers have been attempting to revolutionize the fuel industry for a few decades now. Toyota was one of the front-runners in this effort with their hybrid systems, first introduced in the Prius. While many believe that electric vehicles (EVs) are the way forward, Toyota and others are skeptical about their practicality and environmental impact. As a result, Toyota has invested significant time and resources into hydrogen power, and their efforts may just save the internal combustion engine.
Hydrogen is seen as one of the most promising environmentally friendly power sources for vehicles. Toyota has used hydrogen in combination with batteries to eliminate charging time and reduce emissions. With this technology, vehicles can be refueled with hydrogen at fuel stations, offering convenience to drivers. Additionally, hydrogen-powered vehicles require smaller and fewer batteries compared to traditional EVs, making them more environmentally friendly. Toyota has even explored the idea of using hydrogen in conventional internal combustion engines as a replacement for petrol. Since hydrogen fuel produces water as a byproduct, successfully implementing this technology would revolutionize the automotive industry.
Toyota has made significant progress in this area, developing hydrogen-powered engines such as the 1.6-liter Yaris and the 5.0-liter V-8 from the Lexus RC-F, in collaboration with Yamaha. These engines retain the power and performance of their petrol counterparts, with minimal modifications required. This means that existing production lines and engine designs can be used, further benefiting the environment. In the future, Toyota may even offer hydrogen conversion kits for petrol-powered vehicles, allowing classic car enthusiasts to keep their beloved machines on the road without the need for costly conversions or excessive road taxes.
However, there are some downsides to hydrogen engines, specifically related to the storage of hydrogen. The fuel requires large tanks, reducing interior space in vehicles, and it is highly flammable, necessitating leak-proof and durable storage systems. Once these storage challenges are addressed, the installation of hydrogen fuel stations could be more straightforward compared to EV chargers, as they can utilize existing infrastructure for normal fuels.
How has your experience been as the Managing Director of Range Rover so far?
“It has been amazing. It has been intense with a lot happening. We recently revealed the Range Rover Sport SV three weeks ago, and now the Evoque. We have incredible launches and a wide scope of products. Additionally, there are ongoing transformations, electrification, and management of different brands. There is a lot going on, making it super intense but also very exciting.”
What are your priorities as the Managing Director of Range Rover?
“It is still early days – only two months in – so it’s difficult to determine my specific goals. Currently, I am focused on familiarizing myself with the organization and meeting everyone. I want to understand everyone’s thoughts and feelings about the direction we are heading.
“One of my main priorities is definitely electrification. In my speech, I mentioned the Range Rover fully electric, and that was a genuine factor that influenced my decision to take on this role. I believe it is a significant milestone for the company and for the overall electrification movement. Being able to drive a fully electric Range Rover, especially considering its size as an SUV, is truly amazing.
“Therefore, ensuring we get the electric version right and successfully launching it, while ensuring our customers and clients understand its value, is crucial. I want to delve into the details of all our products and familiarize myself with the organization, but with a particular focus on the Range Rover Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV) that will be coming soon.”
One of the main reasons people buy new trucks every couple of years is to ensure they always have a pickup that is in excellent condition. By trading in their old trucks frequently, they avoid costly repairs, unless they end up with a model that has had a bad year. But what if there was a better way?
Used trucks can be a more cost-effective option because as technology improves, the dependability of vehicles increases. However, older trucks with high mileage can also be reliable. Knowing which used trucks will run forever can help you make the best choice. For example, the best trucks for construction work may not be suitable for off-road adventures, so it’s important to choose the right one for your needs.
The 2000 Ford F-350 is a heavy-duty truck designed for work and towing, but it can also be used for off-road adventures. It was available with a 5.4L V-8, 6.8L V-10, or a 7.3L diesel engine. The 7.3L Power Stroke diesel engine is particularly sought after for its reliability and performance.
2000 Ford F-350 Reliability Based On Owner Feedback
Owners of the 2000 Ford F-350 with the diesel engine praise its reliability. With regular maintenance, these trucks can run for as long as needed without requiring significant repairs. It has received a 5/5 reliability rating from Edmunds.
Problems Owners Reported: Tie rods, ball joints, bearings, and brake rotors may warp easily
Highest Mileage Reported: 170,000
102004 Ram 3500
Reliability Score: 3.5/5
Mecum
Side and front view of a 2004 Ram 3500
The 2004 Ram 3500 is a heavy-duty work truck that can also be used for show or daily driving. It is known for its durability and is considered one of the best trucks in the industry.
2004 Ram 3500 Reliability Rating Based On Owner Feedback
Online reviews for the 2004 Ram 3500 vary, with average ratings ranging from 7 out of 10 to 3.5 out of 5. Owners are generally satisfied with the truck’s performance for work purposes, but some find it lacking in options and mid-range trim levels for daily driving. Overall, it is considered a reliable work truck.
Problems Owners Reported: Odors in the air conditioning, transmission issues, engine cranking problems, faulty thermostat, and sunroof cable issues
Highest Mileage Reported: 298,258
92007 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD
Reliability Score: 5/5
Mecum
Side and front view of a 2007 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD
The 2007 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD is a versatile work truck that can also be used for daily driving. It offers a comfortable ride and optional features such as a backup camera display in the rearview mirror.
Reliability
The 2007 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD received a 5 out of 5 reliability rating from Consumer Reports. It is equipped with either a 6.0L V-8 or a 6.6L turbo diesel engine. The Duramax diesel engine provides good acceleration and performance, and it is highly reliable when properly maintained.
Average Yearly Maintenance Costs: $601 (RepairPal)
Estimated Maintenance Costs During First 10 Years: $14,644 (CarEdge)
Total Recalls: 3 (Passenger side air bag inflator, melted fusible link)
Worst Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD To Buy Used: 2015 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD
82009 GMC Sierra 2500HD
Reliability Score: 5/5
GMC
A front 3/4 studio shot of a 2009 GMC Sierra 2500HD
The 2009 GMC Sierra 2500HD is a reliable work truck that can also be used for daily driving. It offers a comfortable ride and reliable performance.
Reliability
Owners of the 2009 GMC Sierra 2500HD praise its reliability. The truck received a 5 out of 5 reliability rating from Consumer Reports. It is equipped with either a 6.0L V-8 or a 6.6L turbo diesel engine, and it is known for its towing capabilities.
Average Yearly Maintenance Costs: $912 (RepairPal)
Estimated Maintenance Costs During First 10 Years: $13,029 (CarEdge)
Total Recalls: 6 (Passenger side air bag inflator, fire extinguisher clogged, melted fusible link, heated windshield washer module short circuit)
Worst GMC Sierra 2500HD To Buy Used: 2005 GMC Sierra 2500HD
72003 Ford F-250
Reliability Score: 4.5/5
Mecum
Front and side view of a 2003 Ford F-250
The 2003 Ford F-250 is a reliable pickup truck that offers different engine options and two- or four-wheel drive configurations. It is recommended to avoid the 5.4L Triton V-8 engine due to known problems.
2003 Ford F-250 Reliability Based On Owner Feedback
Owners of the 2003 Ford F-250 praise its reliability. The 7.3L Power Stroke diesel engine is particularly popular for its reliability and towing capabilities. Overall, the truck has received positive reviews and is considered a reliable choice.
The 2003 Dodge Ram 2500 is a reliable pickup truck that offers three different engine options and various configurations. It is known for its durability and versatility.
2003 Ram 2500 Reliability Based On Owner Feedback
Owners of the 2003 Ram 2500 have varying reviews, but most agree that the truck is reliable for various tasks. Some use it for work purposes, while others use it for daily driving and recreational activities. The truck received positive ratings overall and is considered reliable.
Problems Owners Reported: Engine cranks but won’t start, transmission issues, water leaks, vibration in the steering wheel
The 2000 Toyota Tacoma is known for its toughness and reliability. While it may not be specifically designed for heavy work, it can handle basic tasks and has a reputation for being reliable.
Reliability
The 2000 Tacoma offers different engine options, with the 2.7L four-cylinder being the standard engine in most versions. The truck has received positive reviews overall and is considered a reliable choice.
Problems Owners Reported: Rust, squeaking from the clutch, water leaks, dash rattles, paint issues
Highest Mileage Reported: 292,000
41999 Nissan Frontier
Reliability Score: 5/5
Mecum
Side view of a 1999 Nissan Frontier
The 1999 Nissan Frontier may not be the first choice for construction workers, but it is a reliable pickup truck that can handle various tasks, including towing and hauling.
1999 Nissan Frontier Reliability Based On Owner Feedback
Owners of the 1999 Nissan Frontier generally praise its reliability, although there may be some minor issues that could have been resolved with regular maintenance. Overall, it is considered a reliable truck that is likely to last with proper care.
Problems Reported: Exterior trim issues, paint deterioration, transmission issues
Highest Mileage Reported: 273,684
32013 Chevy Avalanche
Reliability Rating: 82/100
Mecum
Side view of a 2013 Chevy Avalanche
The 2013 Chevy Avalanche is a versatile pickup truck that offers a comfortable ride and a reliable performance. It is capable of towing and hauling.
Reliability
The 2013 Chevy Avalanche has an overall reliability rating of 82 out of 100 from J.D. Power. It is equipped with either a 5.3L V-8 or a 6.0L V-8 engine, both of which are known for their reliability. The truck has received positive ratings for customer satisfaction.
Average Yearly Maintenance Costs: $722 (RepairPal)
Estimated Maintenance Costs During First 10 Years: $7,220
Total Recalls: 1 (Shifting out of park)
Worst Chevy Avalanche To Buy Used: 2005 Chevy Avalanche
12013 Honda Ridgeline
Reliability Rating: 5/5
The 2013 Honda Ridgeline is a unique pickup truck that offers a comfortable ride and reliability. While some debate its classification as a truck, it is a versatile vehicle capable of towing and hauling.
Reliability
The 2013 Honda Ridgeline has received a perfect reliability rating of 5 out of 5 from Consumer Reports. Owners praise its style, comfort, and most importantly, its reliability. It is a highly rated truck with a high level of customer satisfaction.
Average Yearly Maintenance Costs: $534 (RepairPal)
Estimated Maintenance Costs During First 10 Years: $8,263
Total Recalls: 8 (Frame corrosion, accelerator pedal binding, airbag inflators)
Worst Chevy Avalanche To Buy Used: 2005 Chevy Avalanche
The next-generation BMW M5 is still under development, as the latest spy shots from a couple of days ago still show a heavily camouflaged sedan doing the rounds at the Nurburgring.
However, that hasn’t stopped internet-famous car designer X-Tomi from imagining what the next iteration of BMW’s performance sedan could look like, taking inspiration from the images we published as the work week drew to a close.
With styling cues borrowed from the X5 M and X6 M, X-Tomi’s rendering shows a bright red M5 sitting on signature black M wheels and wearing an X-shaped front end that incorporates a black grille with a red outline.
The hood looks very similar to that used on the M4 coupe and the sensor for the radar-guided cruise control sits in the lower part of the front bumper, which is a much better placement than BMW used on the regular 5 Series, where there was an attempt to integrate it in the double-kidney grille, but it’s hard not to notice it once you get a glimpse of it.
The front fenders are also wider than on the run-of-the-mill 5 Series, which is to be expected, considering the M5 will most certainly have wider wheels, as well as beefier brakes.
With this being a fan rendering, some unknowns remain, such as the powertrain that will motivate the seventh-generation BMW M5. Currently, the Bavarian performance sedan is powered by a 4.4-liter twin-turbo V8 that makes 617 horsepower and 553 pound-feet (750 Newton-meters) of torque in Competition trim.
Rumors say that the next-generation M5 will use the hybrid setup of the XM SUV, so a twin-turbo V8 and a single electric motor that make a combined 644 hp and 590 lb-ft in the base variant and 738 hp and 738 lb-ft of torque in the XM Red Label.
This information hasn’t been confirmed, but we’re pretty sure that BMW will try to one-up the current-gen M5, as well as the electric i5 M60 which packs a dual-motor setup making 590 hp and 549 lb-ft.
As always, we’d like to know what you think about this, so head over to the comments section below to give us your thoughts.
Unlock Your Automotive Passion and Explore the Road Ahead
