Tag Archives: separate

NewsNew

THE FIRST 250F SHOOTOUT, 2006: THE WRAP

Leave a comment

In 2006, the 250 four-stroke class in motocross was lastly full with 5 separate manufacturers. that yr, Kawasaki got here out with an all new bike–within the earlier yr, the KX250 and the RMZ250 had been  shared in a short-lived alliance. For the January, 2006 situation of Dirt Bike, we had the primary full 250F shootout. Here’s how they stacked up in that situation.

1st–YAMAHA YZ250F
For 2006, Yamaha re-engineered their ¼ liter four-stroke with a brand new aluminum body and copious quantities of titanium, complimented by a rejuvenated powerband. The result’s flat gnarly. The YZ250F is graced with very good suspension, a newfound lightness, the dealing with is stellar and the ability covers the gamut of usable and aggressive juice. There isn’t an F on this division that does it higher.

2nd–KAWASAKI KX250F
The KX250F is nearly one hundred pc new for 2006, and with the brand new aluminum body, Showa suspension and motor mods it makes for a mixture that’s deadly. The motor has a savage hit within the mid and rips all the way in which to the rev limiter. With all of the modifications and enhancements the KXF nips on the heels of the Yamaha for the win. On the observe the KXF250 is just a bit comfortable out of the opening. The consequence, second place.

third–HONDA CRF250R
2006 marks a daring transfer for Honda. The twin piper has modifications to the motor, which targeted on reliability and improved bottom-end energy. Older guys love the ability supply, however these bikes are being rated as race bikes, and the dearth of top-end yank limits the race-ability of the machine. The CRF250R handles nice and never one rider had a criticism within the suspension division. The result’s third.

4th–KTM SXF250
This motor flat out rips and is little doubt the strongest within the class. If we needed to choose a motorbike to go to the gate primarily based on energy alone, the KTM would take it arms down. The suspension is one other story; it’s simply not pleasant and requires far more setup time than any of the opposite machines. Still, the sooner you trip the KTM the higher the suspension works. The result’s fourth place.

fifth–SUZUKI RMZ250
The RMZ250 isn’t a nasty bike; it simply didn’t get any upgrades for 2006. It did obtain a number of modifications to the motor to enhance reliability and a few blue accents within the graphics. The metal handlebars sans a cross pad appear prehistoric, the suspension is unchanged and sadly we had been by no means actually pleased with it. The Suzuki, not too far off the mark, tallies fifth.

FORK
1. YAMAHA–Best of all worlds being compliant and agency.
2. KAWASAKI/HONDA–The Showa system presents a fantastic planted really feel to the entrance finish.
4. SUZUKI–The KYB dampers supplied first rate motion however had been harsh on small stuff, but blows by way of on the massive hits.
5. KTM–Harsh and falls by way of the journey on sluggish pace masses on the similar time.

SHOCK
1. YAMAHA–Tractable, compliant and agency. Good stuff.
2. HONDA–A shade comfortable for the tremendous severe racer, however nice motion and hook-up.
3. KAWASAKI–Rides a bit low, requires good rider setup.
4. SUZUKI–Run of the mill, too comfortable for the racer, hacky on the chop.
5. KTM–Linkless could also be lighter, however KTM must fill-in the gaps between bottoming on low pace and absorbing observe hack.

ENGINE
1. KTM–Big hit, slight vibration, a lot of inside racket.
2. KAWASAKI–Great mid hit, lengthy pulling however fairly vacant out of the opening.
3. HONDA–The greatest low energy, nice for supercross tracks. Needs extra yank on prime.
4. YAMAHA–Broad energy with sufficient low, a robust mid and smear of prime juice.
5. SUZUKI-Good unfold of usable juice, only a shade off the mark set by the competitors.

BRAKES
1. KTM–Strong, intense with first rate really feel.
2. KAWASAKI–New petal rotors provide nice really feel, low weight.
3. HONDA/SUZUKI- Good, sturdy, predictable
5. YAMAHA–Nothing horrible, simply not the depth or development of the others.

KTM 250F = 39.4 max horsepower
KX250F = 37.8 max horsepower
CRF250 = 36.7 max horsepower
YZF250 = 35.5 max horsepower
RMZ250 = 35.2 max horsepower

HOW FAR HAVE WE COME?

Just for kicks and giggles, right here’s a have a look at the present 250 four-strokes, as measured on the identical dyno at Pro Circuit. That’s a achieve of 10 horsepower in 18 years. It’s sort of like watching your youngsters develop up. You don’t discover that a lot within the second, however whenever you look again, it’s wonderful.

See you subsequent week!

–Ron Lawson
News

Peugeot Wants To Charge Up Your Commute With The New SPx Concept

Peugeot Motocycles, a totally separate entity from the French automobile producer, is a model that’s been making headlines fairly a bit in recent times. The firm was lately acquired by German holding firm Mutares, and since then, has launched into fairly an aggressive enlargement.

In Europe, Peugeot’s choices embody commuter scooters just like the Django, in addition to three-wheeled scooters just like the Metropolis. More lately, the corporate expanded into the premium phase with an journey maxi-scooter referred to as the XP400, and a sporty, beginner-friendly bare bike referred to as the PM01.

And evidently the corporate’s improvements aren’t slowing down anytime quickly with the revealing of its latest idea referred to as the SPx. 

The Peugeot SPx Concept attracts inspiration from the 103 from 1971.

Digging deep into the corporate’s historical past, the SPx finds its roots in 1971 with the Peugeot 103 moped. Back then, the 103 was seen as greater than only a technique of mobility, embodying values like freedom and independence.

The 103 supplied frequent folks an simply attainable technique of getting round, liberating them from France’s poorly developed public transport system on the time.

The Peugeot SPx idea

Now, greater than half a century later, the SPx embodies the identical idea because the moped that began all of it. But folks of the trendy period have completely different values and priorities, and that is evident within the SPx’s design.

Peugeot says that minimalism, sustainability, and social duty are on the core of the brand new machine, so it’s apparent that the SPx is electrical. It’s additionally light-weight with a monocoque aluminum body. The total package deal seems futuristic, additional accentuated by a cantilever-style entrance fork and a single-sided swingarm.

 

As of this writing, Peugeot has but to reveal any efficiency and tech figures of the SPx. But judging from the best way they describe it, plus the truth that they leverage closely on the heritage of the traditional Peugeot 103, chances are high it’ll be a 125cc-equivalent at most.

A variety of the electrical improvements we’ve been seeing lately have been taking the type of small and compact commuters, as high-performance choices stay few and much between in distinction to their compact siblings. It appears that producers have been taking a step again when it comes to efficiency, particularly in terms of electric motorcycles and scooters, as a whole lot of them goal learners and commuters.

As lovers, we lengthy for high-performance choices that put pleasure and delight above all else. However, the actual fact stays that a whole lot of riders aren’t lovers, however moderately, people trying to commute from A to B in consolation and security.

At the tip of the day, extra choices imply extra folks on two wheels. And that’s at all times factor.

Technology

Everything To Know About Milwaukee’s Quik-Lok Attachment System

However, there are at all times going to be disadvantages to such a flexible software that may separate it from its principal supply of energy. According to Pro Tool Reviews, although not an excessive amount of of an enormous deal, everytime you’re making an attempt to insert an attachment, there could also be occasions when it will not lock immediately, and you are going to end up having to maneuver it round till you hear that last click on. The evaluation web site additionally mentions that there are not any common attachments obtainable, so the one instruments that can be utilized with the ability head are the Quik-Lok attachments. This implies that you must spend money on the system to reap the advantages of proudly owning the ability head.

Users have additionally complained concerning the poles getting caught to the ability head. One Reddit consumer said that their heavier attachments, just like the brushes, get caught as a consequence of their weight, inflicting the software to bend. He did discover that if he laid it down on the bottom after which pulled, the software had much less rigidity and got here out simpler. Other than that, although, there hasn’t been a lot in the best way of adverse evaluations.

Technology

Craftsman Impact Driver Vs. Drill: Which Tool Better Suits Your Needs

There are a number of design components that separate the Craftsman drill from the corporate’s impression driver. To begin. The emphasis with a drill is on velocity and torque adjustment. The Craftsman V20 ½-inch Cordless Drill/Driver has a 15-gear clutch that means that you can set how a lot torque the drill turns with earlier than it offers out. This permits the consumer to have extra exact management over the facility of the drill’s rotation in order that they do not by chance over-tighten fasteners or strip screws whereas eradicating them. There can be a separate drill setting for drilling holes.

Drills have far more utility than impression drivers since they’re helpful for drilling holes and driving fasteners. In truth, many house DIYers get by simply high quality with out ever needing an impression driver. This is primarily as a result of clamping mechanism that drills use for gripping bits. Like most drills, the Craftsman Drill/Driver has an adjustable chuck, permitting them to grip bits in varied sizes. This makes it potential for the software to grip 1000’s of various drill bits, fastener-driving heads, and even some extra eclectic extensions like cleansing brushes. This is why, should you can solely afford one software, you may in all probability wish to get the drill/driver equipment first.

Motorsport

Aventador SVJ VS Huracán Tecnica Drag Race Proves Power Isn’t Everything

Hundreds of hundreds of {dollars} can separate completely different Lamborghini fashions from one another. A $200,000 hole lies between the Aventador SVJ and the Huracan Tecnica, however a brand new drag racing video reveals that spending the additional money doesn’t immediately translate into assured quarter-mile victories.

The SVJ makes 770 horsepower from its naturally aspirated 6.5-liter V12 engine. That’s 130 greater than the Huracan, however energy is not all the things, clearly. The Aventador weighs 3,910 kilos, whereas the Tecnica, with its 640-hp 5.2-liter V10, suggestions the scales at 3,350 lbs.


Camera Reviews

Nikon Zf Review: A Modern Camera Disguised in a Vintage Design

In terms of connectivity options, the Nikon Zf offers USB-C for data transfer and charging, along with separate microphone and headphone jacks, and a mini-HDMI port. This selection should meet the needs of most users. The camera uses an SD card for storage, which is both cost-effective and widely available.

However, the soft plastic port covers on the side of the camera feel flimsy and may wear out quickly. Similar issues have been reported with previous models like the Nikon Z6 and Nikon Z9, where the material tends to warp over time. While the Zf port covers have a different design, their durability remains a concern and they may require replacement within a year or two.

Andy Zahn/SlashGear

Another minor gripe with the camera’s build quality is the mushiness of the directional pad and surrounding buttons on the back. While they are not terrible in any way, they do not match the exceptional craftsmanship found in the rest of the camera. Despite this, the overall construction of the Zf is remarkably well-executed.

The Nikon Snapbridge app is a simple and efficient tool for camera updates, photo downloads, and remote control of the Zf. It serves its purpose effectively.

Technology

How To Separate Names In Microsoft Excel And Google Sheets

If you’re using Microsoft Excel, you can separate names using the Convert Text to Columns Wizard. Here’s how to use the tool in the desktop app:

  1. Open the Excel sheet and select the column that contains the names you want to separate.

  2. Click on Data at the top and select Text to Columns.

  3. In the Convert Text to Columns Wizard, select Delimited under file type.

  4. Click Next.

  5. Choose the appropriate Delimiters. This could be a comma or space, depending on your formatting.

  6. A preview will show you what the separated names will look like. Click Next.

  7. Next to Destination, click on the arrow and choose the column where you want the separated names to appear.

  8. Click Finish.

If you’re using the free online version of Excel, use this method instead:

  1. Select the column with the names you want to separate.

  2. Click Data and select Text to Columns.

  3. Select your Delimiters such as commas or spaces.

  4. A preview will appear on the screen.

  5. Click Apply.

  6. The names will automatically separate into the selected column and the one next to it.

If there are no empty columns, Excel will warn you that it will replace the text in the column to the right. Therefore, it’s best to make sure you have an empty column next to the list of names to avoid losing any data.

Technology

The Reason Why British Aircraft Carriers Have Two Islands

The British have found a clever solution to aircraft carrier design by incorporating two separate islands with independent exhaust and air intake systems. This design offers several advantages over a single large island.

One advantage is that the two smaller islands have a smaller combined footprint, which creates more space on the flight deck. This additional space allows for a full off-site construction of each unit. Another advantage is that each island can mount powerful radar systems without interference. If the radars were mounted closer together in a shared space, there would be significant interference.

However, there are some drawbacks to this design. Navigation is typically handled from the front island, while aircraft operations are carried out from the rear island. This requires heavy reliance on an intercom system for communication, as in-person communication between the two islands is not possible. Some people argue that the two islands detract from the aesthetic appeal of a carrier, but this could simply be a matter of getting used to.

The innovative approach of using two islands is currently employed in two Queen Elizabeth-class carriers: HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Prince of Wales. Both ships were commissioned in 2017 and 2019 respectively. Aside from the dual islands, these carriers also feature facilities such as a cinema, five gyms, and four galleys with a staff of 27.