The XUV 3XO has a extra highly effective turbo-petrol engine than that of the Venue N Line. But which one is faster? Let’s discover out
The Mahindra XUV 3XO has just lately been launched as a facelift to the XUV300 subcompact SUV. While the XUV 3XO boasts new design and options, it nonetheless makes use of the identical powertrain choices as earlier than. However, the turbo-petrol engines now include the choice of a 6-speed torque converter automated. Its direct injection turbo-petrol (TGDi) is probably the most highly effective within the section, however how does it examine to its “sportiest” rival, the Hyundai Venue N Line DCT? We just lately had each automobiles with us, and right here’s how they examine by way of real-world efficiency.
Before moving into the check outcomes, let’s first take a look on the specs of those fashions.
|
Specifications |
Mahindra XUV 3XO |
Hyundai Venue N Line |
|
Engine |
1.2-litre T-GDi (direct injection) turbo-petrol |
1-litre turbo petrol |
|
Power |
130 PS |
120 PS |
|
Torque |
230 Nm |
172 Nm |
|
Transmission |
6-speed AT |
7-speed DCT |
The XUV 3XO’s 1.2-litre direct injection turbo-petrol just isn’t solely 10 PS extra highly effective than the Venue’s but in addition produces 58 Nm extra torque..
Acceleration Test
|
Tests |
Mahindra XUV 3XO |
Hyundai Venue N Line |
|
0-100 kmph |
11.21 seconds |
12.28 seconds |
|
Quarter Mile |
17.72 seconds at 125.72 kmph |
18.75 seconds at 124.49 kmph |
|
Kickdown (20-80kmph) |
7.51 seconds |
8.20 seconds |
In the 0-100 kmph dash, the XUV 3XO was faster by 1.07 seconds in comparison with the Hyundai Venue N Line. The distinction between their quarter-mile timings was 1.03 seconds, the Mahindra being faster. However, within the kickdown from 20 to 80 kmph, the distinction between their timings diminished to 0.70 seconds.
Though the distinction wasn’t important, the XUV 3XO clearly has an edge over the Venue N Line with its further torque and energy.
Braking Test
|
Tests |
Mahindra XUV 3XO |
Hyundai Venue N Line |
|
100-0 kmph |
41.03 metres |
43.50 metres |
|
80-0 kmph |
26.40 metres |
26.90 metres |
When braking from 100 kmph to carry the automobile to an entire cease, the XUV 3XO travelled nearly 2.50 metres lower than the Venue N Line. However when braking from 80 kmph, they nearly travelled related distances to return to a standstill.
Both XUV 3XO and Venue N Line use 215-section tyres, however XUV 3XO has larger 17-inch alloys, whereas the Venue N Line will get 16-inch alloy wheels. Both subcompact SUVs right here include all-four disc brakes.
Final Takeaway
So, the Mahindra XUV 3XO provides higher efficiency total than the Hyundai Venue N Line DCT, and some extra options too. However, the variants examined do have a notable worth distinction as properly.
Disclaimer: Please notice that the efficiency figures might differ relying on the motive force, driving circumstances, automobile’s well being, and local weather.
Price
|
Mahindra XUV 3XO T-GDi AT |
Hyundai Venue N Line DCT |
|
Rs 13.49 lakh to Rs 15.49 lakh |
Rs 12.87 lakh to Rs 13.75 lakh |
The XUV 3XO variant as examined, the AX7L with the automated transmission is pricier by over Rs 15 lakh than the top-spec Venue N Line DCT. In addition to the efficiency, you additionally get options like a panoramic sunroof, larger screens together with a digital driver’s show and adaptive cruise management. However, in terms of sporty attraction by way of seems and sound, the Hyundai N Line subcompact SUV is difficult to beat.
Both of those subcompact SUVs additionally tackle the likes of the Tata Nexon, Kia Sonet, Maruti Brezza, Renault Kiger, and Nissan Magnite.
Read More on : XUV 3XO AMT
